Geochemical Perspectives Letters
Geochemical
Perspectives Letters
Geochemical
Perspectives
  • Submit here
  • Track your paper
  • For authors
  • e-Alerts
  • Home
  • About
    • About the journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Policy
    • Publication Ethics
  • Submission & Review
    • Copyright & Permissions
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
  • Current issue
  • All issues
  • Submit
Select Page Menu

by admin | Jun 18, 2026 | mainpost, vol40

A. Hylén, S. Arndt, J.P. Balmonte, R. Bosman, W. Bui, L. Chou, I. Delbono, C. Goossens, P.O.J. Hall, S. Hidalgo-Martinez, R.K. James, M. Kononets, P. Ley, C. März, S.P. Purayil, J. Reardon, P. Reyniers, F. Sales de Freitas, L. Verweirder, K. Wagner, C. Wittig, K.R. Hendry, S.J. van de Velde

40

2621

14

January

2026

5

May

2026

18

June

2026

43

48

0

Next article >> << Previous article

Ikaite precipitation indicates near surface occurrence of methane in an Icelandic fjord

A. Hylén1,2,

1Geobiology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
2Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, CEREGE, Technopôle de l’Arbois-Méditerranée, BP80, 13545 Aix-en-Provence, France

S. Arndt3,4,

3BGeoSys, Department of Geosciences, Society and Environment, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP160/02, 50 Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
4iC3, Department of Geoscience, Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

J.P. Balmonte5,

5Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, USA

R. Bosman6,

6Institute for Biochemistry and Signal Transduction, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

W. Bui3,

3BGeoSys, Department of Geosciences, Society and Environment, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP160/02, 50 Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

L. Chou3,

3BGeoSys, Department of Geosciences, Society and Environment, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP160/02, 50 Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

I. Delbono7,

7ENEA Marine Environment Research Centre, Department for Sustainability, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecosystems, 19032 Pozzuolo di Lerici (La Spezia), Italy

C. Goossens1,

1Geobiology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium

P.O.J. Hall8,

8Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden

S. Hidalgo-Martinez1,

1Geobiology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium

R.K. James3,9,

3BGeoSys, Department of Geosciences, Society and Environment, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP160/02, 50 Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
9Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense Denmark

M. Kononets8,10,

8Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
10Research consultant, Fredrikas Gård 2, 414 83, Gothenburg, Sweden

P. Ley1,

1Geobiology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium

C. März11,

11Institute for Geosciences, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1-3, 53115 Bonn, Germany

S.P. Purayil12,

12Operational Directorate Natural Environment, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium

J. Reardon13,

13External Relations Team, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

P. Reyniers14,

14Department of Geology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 297, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

F. Sales de Freitas3,

3BGeoSys, Department of Geosciences, Society and Environment, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP160/02, 50 Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

L. Verweirder14,

14Department of Geology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 297, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

K. Wagner11,

11Institute for Geosciences, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1-3, 53115 Bonn, Germany

C. Wittig15,

15Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

K.R. Hendry16,17,

16British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK
17Queens’ College, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9ET, UK

S.J. van de Velde1,18,19

1Geobiology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
18Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, Ōtepoti Dunedin, 9016, Aotearoa New Zealand
19Earth Sciences New Zealand, Te Whanganui-a-Tara Wellington, 6021, Aotearoa New Zealand

Affiliations | Corresponding Author | Cite as | Funding information

A. Hylén
Email: hylen@cerege.fr

1Geobiology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
2Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, CEREGE, Technopôle de l’Arbois-Méditerranée, BP80, 13545 Aix-en-Provence, France
3BGeoSys, Department of Geosciences, Society and Environment, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP160/02, 50 Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
4iC3, Department of Geoscience, Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
5Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, USA
6Institute for Biochemistry and Signal Transduction, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
7ENEA Marine Environment Research Centre, Department for Sustainability, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecosystems, 19032 Pozzuolo di Lerici (La Spezia), Italy
8Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
9Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense Denmark
10Research consultant, Fredrikas Gård 2, 414 83, Gothenburg, Sweden
11Institute for Geosciences, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1-3, 53115 Bonn, Germany
12Operational Directorate Natural Environment, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
13External Relations Team, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
14Department of Geology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 297, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
15Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
16British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK
17Queens’ College, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9ET, UK
18Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, Ōtepoti Dunedin, 9016, Aotearoa New Zealand
19Earth Sciences New Zealand, Te Whanganui-a-Tara Wellington, 6021, Aotearoa New Zealand

Hylén, A., Arndt, S., Balmonte, J.P., Bosman, R., Bui, W., Chou, L., Delbono, I., Goossens, C., Hall, P.O.J., Hidalgo-Martinez, S., James, R.K., Kononets, M., Ley, P., März, C., Purayil, S.P., Reardon, J., Reyniers, P., Sales de Freitas, F., Verweirder, L., Wagner, K., Wittig, C., Hendry, K.R., van de Velde, S.J. (2026) Ikaite precipitation indicates near surface occurrence of methane in an Icelandic fjord. Geochem. Persp. Let. 40, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2621

The Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (grant no RV/21/DEHEAT), Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO; grants no. 1241724N, 1139224N, 1114521N, and 11P8Z24N), Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (MSCA; grants no. 101204337 and 101060342), F.R.S.-FNRS (FIESTA, grant no. 35266740), US National Science Foundation (grant no. OCE-2241721), the Lehigh CAS Dean’s Opportunity Grant, Queens’ College, University of Cambridge, the Natural Environment Research Council (grant no. NE/X014819/1).

Geochemical Perspectives Letters v40 | https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2621
Received 14 January 2026 | Accepted 5 May 2026 | Published 18 June 2026

Copyright © 2026 The Authors

Published by the European Association of Geochemistry
under Creative Commons License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Keywords: marine sediments, carbon isotope geochemistry, authigenic carbonates, high-latitude environments, porewater, sediment-water exchange

PDF PDF+SI
  • Share this article

  • Article views:
    404

    Cumulative count of HTML views and PDF downloads.

  • Download Citation
  • Rights & Permissions


top

Abstract

Abstract | Introduction | Site Description and Sampling | Sediment Geochemistry | Carbonate Dynamics and Ikaite Formation | Ikaite as an Indicator of Methane | Acknowledgments | References | Supplementary Information

Climate change driven release of methane (CH4) from polar and sub-polar sediments could accelerate global warming, and tracking CH4 in cold sediments over geological time helps predict future releases. Isotopic signatures of ikaite (CaCO3·6H2O) and its pseudomorph, glendonite, may be used to identify past CH4 in cold environments, as alkalinity (AT) from anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) can induce precipitation of this mineral at low temperatures. However, the suitability of ikaite as a proxy for CH4 near the sediment surface remains uncertain, as ikaite linked to modern seeps has only been retrieved from sediment depths of several metres. We report ikaite crystals in surface sediments (0–40 cm depth) in Reyðarfjörður, Iceland. High AT fluxes from deeper sediment layers and low stable carbon isotope (δ13C) values of the ikaite (−49.8 to –53.8 ‰) suggest formation from AOM, while sub-bottom profiling indicates shallow gas below the sampling site. As such, the recovered ikaite provides indirect evidence that CH4 locally reaches shallow sediment layers in the studied fjord, considerably expanding the environmental range of CH4-derived ikaite and substantiating ikaite and glendonite as proxies for cold environment CH4 seeps.

Figures

Figure 1 (a) Map of the sampling site (RF2) in Reyðarfjörður, eastern Iceland. The area within the black line shows the bottom topography as mapped by multibeam echo sounder. The orange line shows the location of the sub-bottom transect in panel B. The map was produced with the datasets LMI Digital Elevation Model, IS 50V Strandlína and IS 50V Vatnafar from Náttúrufræðistofnun, licensed under CC BY 4.0, and the EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium (2024). (b) Sub-bottom transect showing acoustic blanking below station RF2, suggesting the presence of gas. TWT = two way travel time.

Figure 2 (a) Photograph of three of the ikaite crystals found at RF2I. (b) Photograph of a dried, recrystallised ikaite crystal marked with ‘b’ in panel (a). (c) Global compilation of isotopic compositions of glendonite and ikaite (Rogov et al., 2021), including the ikaite from this study.

Figure 3 Porewater and solid phase profiles from stations RF2 and RF2I. Filled and empty markers represent replicate sediment cores, grey lines represent microprofiling data. The light grey area in the pH graph marks the scale of the O2 graph. Note the differences in scales on both x and y axes between plots.

Figure 4 (a) Sediment-water fluxes of alkalinity (AT), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and total oxygen uptake (TOU) from RF2 (grey) and RF2I (orange). Large circles mark fluxes measured in the incubation chambers; small circles mark diffusive O2 uptake rates from microprofiling data. (b) Keeling plot showing the DIC concentration and δ13C composition (δ13CDIC) in the incubations. The calculated intercepts indicate the δ13C signal of the combined DIC sources in each incubation.

Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4

View all figures and tables





top

Introduction

Abstract | Introduction | Site Description and Sampling | Sediment Geochemistry | Carbonate Dynamics and Ikaite Formation | Ikaite as an Indicator of Methane | Acknowledgments | References | Supplementary Information


The large reservoirs of methane (CH4) in Arctic and sub-Arctic marine sediments are of considerable interest due to their potential destabilisation from global warming (James et al., 2016

James, R.H., Bousquet, P., Bussmann, I., Haeckel, M., Kipfer, R., Leifer, I., Niemann, H., Ostrovsky, I., Piskozub, J., Rehder, G., Treude, T., Vielstädte, L., Greinert, J. (2016) Effects of climate change on methane emissions from seafloor sediments in the Arctic Ocean: A review. Limnology and Oceanography 61, S283–S299. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10307

). Identifying CH4 reservoirs is crucial for understanding their stability, as is tracking their occurrences and responses to climate change over geological time. Since the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) produces alkalinity (AT) and can induce authigenic carbonate precipitation in sediments, carbonates can be used to trace CH4 reservoirs by their stable carbon isotope (δ13C) composition (Campbell, 2006

Campbell, K.A. (2006) Hydrocarbon seep and hydrothermal vent paleoenvironments and paleontology: Past developments and future research directions. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 232, 362–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.06.018

; Vickers et al., 2022

Vickers, M.L., Vickers, M., Rickaby, R.E.M., Wu, H., Bernasconi, S.M., Ullmann, C.V., Bohrmann, G., Spielhagen, R.F., Kassens, H., Pagh Schultz, B., Alwmark, C., Thibault, N., Korte, C. (2022) The ikaite to calcite transformation: Implications for palaeoclimate studies. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 334, 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.08.001

). Isotopically heavy carbonates (> −5 ‰) indicate incorporation of residual dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) from methanogenesis, while isotopically light carbonates (< −30 ‰) precipitate from DIC formed through AOM. By contrast, carbonates formed from DIC released during organic matter mineralisation have δ13C values around −25 ‰.

The mineral ikaite (CaCO3·6H2O) (Pauly, 1963

Pauly, H. (1963) “Ikaite”, a new mineral from Greenland. Arctic 16, 263–264. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic3545

) is of particular interest as an indicator of CH4 and AOM. It forms at low temperatures (<6 °C) under highly alkaline conditions, where inhibitors such as phosphate and organic compounds suppress the precipitation of less soluble calcium carbonate phases, such as calcite and aragonite (Lu et al., 2012

Lu, Z., Rickaby, R.E.M., Kennedy, H., Kennedy, P., Pancost, R.D., Shaw, S., Lennie, A., Wellner, J., Anderson, J.B. (2012) An ikaite record of late Holocene climate at the Antarctic Peninsula. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 325–326, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.01.036

; Zhou et al., 2015

Zhou, X., Lu, Z., Rickaby, R.E.M., Domack, E.W., Wellner, J.S., Kennedy, H.A. (2015) Ikaite Abundance Controlled by Porewater Phosphorus Level: Potential Links to Dust and Productivity. The Journal of Geology 123, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1086/681918

; Tollefsen et al., 2018

Tollefsen, E., Stockmann, G., Skelton, A., Mörth, C.-M., Dupraz, C., Sturkell, E. (2018) Chemical controls on ikaite formation. Mineralogical Magazine 82, 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2018.110

). Because of this temperature dependence, ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite are used as proxies for cold conditions in palaeoenvironmental reconstructions (Rogov et al., 2021

Rogov, M., Ershova, V., Vereshchagin, O., Vasileva, K., Mikhailova, K., Krylov, A. (2021) Database of global glendonite and ikaite records throughout the Phanerozoic. Earth System Science Data. Copernicus GmbH 13, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-343-2021

; Schultz et al., 2022

Schultz, B., Thibault, N., Huggett, J. (2022) The minerals ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite: Historical perspective and legacies of Douglas Shearman and Alec K. Smith. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 133, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2022.02.003

; Vickers et al., 2022

Vickers, M.L., Vickers, M., Rickaby, R.E.M., Wu, H., Bernasconi, S.M., Ullmann, C.V., Bohrmann, G., Spielhagen, R.F., Kassens, H., Pagh Schultz, B., Alwmark, C., Thibault, N., Korte, C. (2022) The ikaite to calcite transformation: Implications for palaeoclimate studies. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 334, 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.08.001

), and their δ13C signatures and presence have been applied to identify modern and past CH4 seeps in cold systems (Schubert et al., 1997

Schubert, C.J., Nürnberg, D., Scheele, N., Pauer, F., Kriews, M. (1997) 13C isotope depletion in ikaite crystals: evidence for methane release from the Siberian shelves? Geo-Marine Letters 17, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003670050023

; Greinert and Derkachev, 2004

Greinert, J., Derkachev, A. (2004) Glendonites and methane-derived Mg-calcites in the Sea of Okhotsk, Eastern Siberia: implications of a venting-related ikaite/glendonite formation. Marine Geology 204, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00354-2

; Teichert and Luppold, 2013

Teichert, B.M.A., Luppold, F.W. (2013) Glendonites from an Early Jurassic methane seep — Climate or methane indicators? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 390, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.03.001

; Morales et al., 2017

Morales, C., Rogov, M., Wierzbowski, H., Ershova, V., Suan, G., Adatte, T., Föllmi, K.B., Tegelaar, E., Reichart, G.-J., de Lange, G.J., Middelburg, J.J., van de Schootbrugge, B. (2017) Glendonites track methane seepage in Mesozoic polar seas. Geology 45, 503–506. https://doi.org/10.1130/G38967.1

).

Although ikaite suggested to have formed due to intense organic matter degradation has been found near the sediment surface (Kennedy, 2022

Kennedy, G.L. (2022) Glendonites: Enigmatic Mineral Pseudomorphs and Their Ephemeral Precursor. Rocks and Minerals 97, 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/00357529.2022.2087146

), ikaite linked with CH4 and AOM has only been retrieved from 1–4 m sediment depth (Schubert et al., 1997

Schubert, C.J., Nürnberg, D., Scheele, N., Pauer, F., Kriews, M. (1997) 13C isotope depletion in ikaite crystals: evidence for methane release from the Siberian shelves? Geo-Marine Letters 17, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003670050023

; Lu et al., 2012

Lu, Z., Rickaby, R.E.M., Kennedy, H., Kennedy, P., Pancost, R.D., Shaw, S., Lennie, A., Wellner, J., Anderson, J.B. (2012) An ikaite record of late Holocene climate at the Antarctic Peninsula. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 325–326, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.01.036

; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022

Hiruta, A., Matsumoto, R. (2022) Geochemical comparison of ikaite and methane-derived authigenic carbonates recovered from Echigo Bank in the Sea of Japan. Marine Geology 443, 106672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2021.106672

; Kolesnik et al., 2025

Kolesnik, O.N., Kolesnik, A.N., Karabtsov, A.A., Vasilenko, Yu. P., Gorbarev, A.A. (2025) Ikaite from Holocene Sediments of the Chukchi Sea. Doklady Earth Sciences 520, 3. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X24604383

; also see references in Schultz et al., 2022

Schultz, B., Thibault, N., Huggett, J. (2022) The minerals ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite: Historical perspective and legacies of Douglas Shearman and Alec K. Smith. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 133, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2022.02.003

). How well ikaite and glendonite trace CH4 occurrences at the sediment-water interface thus remains unclear. Here, we report the occurrence of ikaite crystals in the surface sediment (top 40 cm) of Reyðarfjörður, Iceland. Sediment geochemistry and low ikaite δ13C values indicate that the mineral formed as a result of AOM. This observation substantially extends the known depth range of CH4 derived ikaite (Teichert and Luppold, 2013

Teichert, B.M.A., Luppold, F.W. (2013) Glendonites from an Early Jurassic methane seep — Climate or methane indicators? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 390, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.03.001

; Morales et al., 2017

Morales, C., Rogov, M., Wierzbowski, H., Ershova, V., Suan, G., Adatte, T., Föllmi, K.B., Tegelaar, E., Reichart, G.-J., de Lange, G.J., Middelburg, J.J., van de Schootbrugge, B. (2017) Glendonites track methane seepage in Mesozoic polar seas. Geology 45, 503–506. https://doi.org/10.1130/G38967.1

), supporting its use for tracing past occurrences of CH4 at the sediment surface, and demonstrates, for the first time, the presence of ikaite in Icelandic waters (Rogov et al., 2021

Rogov, M., Ershova, V., Vereshchagin, O., Vasileva, K., Mikhailova, K., Krylov, A. (2021) Database of global glendonite and ikaite records throughout the Phanerozoic. Earth System Science Data. Copernicus GmbH 13, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-343-2021

).

top

Site Description and Sampling

Abstract | Introduction | Site Description and Sampling | Sediment Geochemistry | Carbonate Dynamics and Ikaite Formation | Ikaite as an Indicator of Methane | Acknowledgments | References | Supplementary Information


Samples were collected in Reyðarfjörður (Fig. 1a), eastern Iceland, aboard the R/V Belgica on July 8, 2023. Sampling and analytical methods are detailed in the Supplementary Information. The fjord is not influenced by active volcanic systems (Thordarson and Höskuldsson, 2008

Thordarson, T., Höskuldsson, Á. (2008) Postglacial volcanism in Iceland. Jökull 58, 197–228. https://doi.org/10.33799/jokull2008.58.197

). The sampling site RF2 (65° 0.9021’ N; 13° 53.5279’ W; 150 m depth) is located above an area of acoustic blanking identified by a hull mounted TOPAS profiler (Fig. 1b), indicating sub-seafloor gas (Judd and Hovland, 1992

Judd, A.G., Hovland, M. (1992) The evidence of shallow gas in marine sediments. Continental Shelf Research 12, 1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(92)90070-Z

). Prior to sediment sampling, CTD measurements 5 m above the seafloor recorded a salinity of 34.4, a temperature of 4.2 °C, and a dissolved oxygen (O2) concentration of 287 μmol kg−1.


Figure 1 (a) Map of the sampling site (RF2) in Reyðarfjörður, eastern Iceland. The area within the black line shows the bottom topography as mapped by multibeam echo sounder. The orange line shows the location of the sub-bottom transect in panel B. The map was produced with the datasets LMI Digital Elevation Model, IS 50V Strandlína and IS 50V Vatnafar from Náttúrufræðistofnun, licensed under CC BY 4.0, and the EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium (2024)

EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium (2024) https://doi.org/10.12770/cf51df64-56f9-4a99-b1aa-36b8d7b743a1

. (b) Sub-bottom transect showing acoustic blanking below station RF2, suggesting the presence of gas. TWT = two way travel time.
Full size image


Sediment for geochemical profiling was collected using a GEMAX corer (Ø 9 cm). One set of cores was used for microsensor profiling for O2, hydrogen sulphide (H2S), and pH. Replicate cores were sliced and centrifuged to separate solids from porewater. The solid phase was analysed for particulate organic and inorganic carbon (POC, PIC), their stable isotope compositions (δ13CPOC, δ13CPIC), mineralogy, and the contents of iron oxides, acid volatile sulphide (AVS), and chromium reducible sulphide (CRS). Porewater was analysed for DIC, total alkalinity (AT), dissolved phosphorus, sulphur, calcium, and magnesium. Porewater concentrations of DIC and AT were used to calculate pH and the saturation states of calcite and aragonite. An additional sediment core was collected for 210Pb and 137Cs dating.

A box corer (Ø 50 cm) was used to collect the upper 40 cm of sediment for flux incubations. Three replicate cores, collected 5 m apart, were sub-cored into incubation chambers (Ø 14.4 cm; Fig. S-1) for measuring sediment-water fluxes of DIC (including δ13C composition; δ13CDIC), AT, and O2. The top 5 cm of all cores were brown and bioturbated, but deeper layers varied: two were grey to dark grey, and one was black. Owing to these visual differences, the black core was designated RF2I. Repeated attempts to relocate RF2I-type sediment were unsuccessful, indicating strong local heterogeneity.

Multiple crystals resembling ikaite (Fig. 2a) were found at 20–40 cm sediment depth at RF2I. One crystal was analysed by single crystal XRD under a nitrogen gas cryostream, and the stable isotope composition (δ13Cikaite and δ18Oikaite) was measured at two points on another (Fig. 2b). Following the flux incubation, the RF2I sediment was sub-cored (Ø 5.9 cm) to <20 cm sediment depth for solid phase carbon and mineralogy analyses, microprofiles of O2, pH and H2S, and measurement of porewater DIC and AT. No ikaite crystals were found in the incubated sediment.


Figure 2 (a) Photograph of three of the ikaite crystals found at RF2I. (b) Photograph of a dried, recrystallised ikaite crystal marked with ‘b’ in panel (a). (c) Global compilation of isotopic compositions of glendonite and ikaite (Rogov et al., 2021

Rogov, M., Ershova, V., Vereshchagin, O., Vasileva, K., Mikhailova, K., Krylov, A. (2021) Database of global glendonite and ikaite records throughout the Phanerozoic. Earth System Science Data. Copernicus GmbH 13, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-343-2021

), including the ikaite from this study.
Full size image


top

Sediment Geochemistry

Abstract | Introduction | Site Description and Sampling | Sediment Geochemistry | Carbonate Dynamics and Ikaite Formation | Ikaite as an Indicator of Methane | Acknowledgments | References | Supplementary Information


The sediment geochemistry reflected the visual differences between RF2 and RF2I (Fig. S-1). At RF2, porewater AT and DIC increased from 2.6 mmol kg−1 at the surface to 7.0 mmol kg−1 at depth, with O2 penetrating 0.4 cm (Fig. 3). In contrast, the RF2I sediment was heterogeneous and showed signs of more intense diagenesis. In one replicate core, the porewater AT and DIC increased from 3.0 mmol kg−1 at the surface to 15 mmol kg−1 at depth, while in a second core, they reached 20–25 mmol kg−1, with AT clearly exceeding DIC. The O2 penetration depths clustered into two groups at 0.1 and 0.3 cm, and a strong H2S odour was present. At both sites, measured and calculated porewater pH profiles were in agreement. The calculated pH is sensitive to small DIC and AT losses during sampling, so profiles should be seen as general trends. At both sites, pH decreased in the upper centimetres, stabilising near 7.5 at RF2 but increasing with depth to ∼9 at RF2I, particularly in the core with high At and DIC.


Figure 3 Porewater and solid phase profiles from stations RF2 and RF2I. Filled and empty markers represent replicate sediment cores, grey lines represent microprofiling data. The light grey area in the pH graph marks the scale of the O2 graph. Note the differences in scales on both x and y axes between plots.
Full size image


The geochemical differences between RF2 and RF2I were not due to variations in organic matter degradation, as POC contents were similar (Fig. 3). No differences in mineralogy as determined by powder XRD were observed between sites (Fig. S-2). Instead, linear increases in the DIC and AT at the bottom of the porewater profiles suggest upward diffusion from deeper sediment layers at both locations, with considerably steeper concentration gradients indicating stronger upward fluxes at RF2I. Elevated pH, and DIC and AT concentrations are consistent with AOM (Campbell, 2006

Campbell, K.A. (2006) Hydrocarbon seep and hydrothermal vent paleoenvironments and paleontology: Past developments and future research directions. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 232, 362–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.06.018

) and suggest a deep CH4 source, plausibly connected to the area of acoustic blanking seen in the TOPAS profile (Fig. 1b). Although AOM typically produces H2S via sulphate reduction (Egger et al., 2018

Egger, M., Riedinger, N., Mogollón, J.M., Jørgensen, B.B. (2018) Global diffusive fluxes of methane in marine sediments. Nature Geoscience 11, 421–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0122-8

) and a strong H2S odour was noted during coring, no H2S was detected in the top 4 cm of sediment. This absence of H2S is consistent with high ferric iron contents (200–300 μmol g−1) at 2–15 cm depth at station RF2, which could scavenge H2S as iron sulphides (AVS and CRS; Fig. S-3; Berner, 1970

Berner, R.A. (1970) Sedimentary pyrite formation. American Journal of Science 268, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.268.1.1

).

Despite contrasting porewater profiles at RF2 and RF2I, the measured sediment-water fluxes of AT, DIC, and O2 were similar across both sites (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, diffusive O2 uptake rates calculated from microprofiles at RF2I clustered into two groups at 16–20 mmol m−2 d−1 and 5–6 mmol m−2 d−1, whereas the total O2 uptake (TOU) measured in the chamber was 15 mmol m−2 d−1. At RF2, the diffusive O2 uptake was 6–9 mmol m−2 d−1, and the TOU was 11–12 mmol m−2 d−1. Small scale differences in sediment-water solute exchange, as indicated by microprofiles, suggest heterogeneous chemical conditions within the sediment at RF2I, whereas the TOU over the larger surface area of the incubation chamber approached that at RF2.


Figure 4 (a) Sediment-water fluxes of alkalinity (AT), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and total oxygen uptake (TOU) from RF2 (grey) and RF2I (orange). Large circles mark fluxes measured in the incubation chambers; small circles mark diffusive O2 uptake rates from microprofiling data. (b) Keeling plot showing the DIC concentration and δ13C composition (δ13CDIC) in the incubations. The calculated intercepts indicate the δ13C signal of the combined DIC sources in each incubation.
Full size image


top

Carbonate Dynamics and Ikaite Formation

Abstract | Introduction | Site Description and Sampling | Sediment Geochemistry | Carbonate Dynamics and Ikaite Formation | Ikaite as an Indicator of Methane | Acknowledgments | References | Supplementary Information


Analysis by XRD confirmed the mineral as ikaite (a = 8.760 Å, b = 8.305 Å, c = 11.000 Å, β = 110.477, space group C2/c). The ikaite δ13C values (−49.8 to −53.8 ‰), the lowest reported for ikaite and glendonite (Fig. 2c; Rogov et al., 2020

Rogov, M., Vasileva, K., Mikhailova, K., Ershova, V. (2020) Database of global glendonite and ikaite records throughout the Phanerozoic. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7833894

, 2021

Rogov, M., Ershova, V., Vereshchagin, O., Vasileva, K., Mikhailova, K., Krylov, A. (2021) Database of global glendonite and ikaite records throughout the Phanerozoic. Earth System Science Data. Copernicus GmbH 13, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-343-2021

), indicate carbon derived from DIC formed during AOM (Greinert and Derkachev, 2004

Greinert, J., Derkachev, A. (2004) Glendonites and methane-derived Mg-calcites in the Sea of Okhotsk, Eastern Siberia: implications of a venting-related ikaite/glendonite formation. Marine Geology 204, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00354-2

; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022

Hiruta, A., Matsumoto, R. (2022) Geochemical comparison of ikaite and methane-derived authigenic carbonates recovered from Echigo Bank in the Sea of Japan. Marine Geology 443, 106672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2021.106672

). At site RF2I, very high porewater saturation states for aragonite (>80) and calcite (>100; Fig. 3) suggest that the precipitation of these phases was suppressed, allowing AT to accumulate to levels conducive for ikaite formation. Porewater concentrations of phosphorus, Mg and sulfur, known inhibitors of calcite and aragonite growth (Bischoff et al., 1993

Bischoff, J.L., Fitzpatrick, J.A., Rosenbauer, R.J. (1993) The Solubility and Stabilization of Ikaite (CaCO3·6H2O) from 0° to 25°C: Environmental and Paleoclimatic Implications for Thinolite Tufa. The Journal of Geology 101, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/648194

; Tollefsen et al., 2018

Tollefsen, E., Stockmann, G., Skelton, A., Mörth, C.-M., Dupraz, C., Sturkell, E. (2018) Chemical controls on ikaite formation. Mineralogical Magazine 82, 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2018.110

), were within expected ranges for coastal sediments at RF2 (Schulz, 2006

Schulz, H.D. (2006) Quantification of Early Diagenesis: Dissolved Constituents in Pore Water and Signals in the Solid Phase. In: Schulz, H.D., Zabel, M. (Eds.) Marine Geochemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 73–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32144-6_3

; Ruttenberg, 2014

Ruttenberg, K.C. (2014) The Global Phosphorus Cycle. In: Holland, H.D., Turekian, K.K. (Eds.) Treatise on Geochemistry (Second Edition). Elsevier, Oxford, 499–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00813-5

; Fig. S-3). Assuming the main difference between sites was the upward migration of CH4-rich porewater at RF2I, these results indicate that aragonite and calcite precipitation can be suppressed under typical coastal conditions, enabling ikaite formation at cold temperatures and a high AT supply.

The δ13CPIC at RF2 and RF2I (Fig. 3), along with decreasing porewater Ca and Mg with depth at RF2 (Fig. S-3), indicate authigenic carbonate precipitation within the top 20 cm of sediment. Increasingly negative δ13CPIC values with depth suggest in situ PIC formation incorporating isotopically light DIC from organic matter mineralisation or AOM (Campbell, 2006

Campbell, K.A. (2006) Hydrocarbon seep and hydrothermal vent paleoenvironments and paleontology: Past developments and future research directions. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 232, 362–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.06.018

). More negative δ13CPIC values at RF2I (−3.35 to 0.00 ‰) compared to RF2 (−1.2 to 0.05 ‰) imply more intense carbonate formation or a greater contribution of AOM derived DIC. Contrasting carbonate dynamics are also reflected in the δ13C composition of the sediment-water DIC flux, with lighter DIC released at RF2I (Fig. 4b). Assuming organic matter degradation and carbonate dissolution are the only DIC sources, their relative contributions were estimated from a Keeling plot (Pataki et al., 2003

Pataki, D.E., Ehleringer, J.R., Flanagan, L.B., Yakir, D., Bowling, D.R., Still, C.J., Buchmann, N., Kaplan, J.O., Berry, J.A. (2003) The application and interpretation of Keeling plots in terrestrial carbon cycle research. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001850

). Carbonate dissolution contributed 36–66 % of the DIC efflux at RF2 (SI), consistent with aragonite and calcite undersaturation in the top 5–10 cm of sediment (Fig. 3). At RF2I, the Keeling plot indicated no dissolution, although isotopically light DIC from CH4 oxidation was not considered and may have obscured any dissolution signal.

top

Ikaite as an Indicator of Methane

Abstract | Introduction | Site Description and Sampling | Sediment Geochemistry | Carbonate Dynamics and Ikaite Formation | Ikaite as an Indicator of Methane | Acknowledgments | References | Supplementary Information


This study reports the discovery of ikaite near the sediment surface (<40 cm) in an Icelandic fjord. While our data suggest formation driven by AOM, alternative mechanisms should be considered. Volcanic ash diagenesis can enhance carbonate saturation and promote ikaite precipitation (Vickers et al., 2024

Vickers, M.L., Jones, M.T., Longman, J., Evans, D., Ullmann, C.V., Wulfsberg Stokke, E., Vickers, M., Frieling, J., Harper, D.T., Clementi, V.J., IODP Expedition 396 Scientists (2024) Paleocene–Eocene age glendonites from the Mid-Norwegian Margin – indicators of cold snaps in the hothouse? Climate of the Past 20, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1-2024

), but this is unlikely here given the absence of nearby volcanic activity (Thordarson and Höskuldsson, 2008

Thordarson, T., Höskuldsson, Á. (2008) Postglacial volcanism in Iceland. Jökull 58, 197–228. https://doi.org/10.33799/jokull2008.58.197

) and the mineralogical similarities between RF2 and RF2I (Fig. S-2). Ikaite formation can also occur via seepage of highly alkaline groundwater, as observed in the Ikka fjord (Buchardt et al., 1997

Buchardt, B., Seaman, P., Stockmann, G., Vous, M., Wilken, U., Düwel, L., Kristiansen, A., Jenner, C., Whiticar, M.J., Kristensen, R.M., Petersen, G.H., Thorbjørn, L. (1997) Submarine columns of ikaite tufa. Nature 390, 129–130. https://doi.org/10.1038/36474

). The proximity to the Helgustaðir mine, where Icelandic spar was historically extracted, and faults in the region (Karson et al., 2018

Karson, J.A., Farrell, J.A., Chutas, L.A., Nanfito, A.F., Proett, J.A., Runnals, K.T., Sæmundsson, K. (2018) Rift-Parallel Strike-Slip Faulting Near the Iceland Plate Boundary Zone: Implications for Propagating Rifts. Tectonics 37, 4567–4594. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005206

), indicate that such inputs are possible. However, the exceptionally low δ13Cikaite values strongly suggest mineral formation driven by intense AOM fuelled by a deep CH4 source; a hypothesis supported by porewater geochemistry and sub-bottom profiling indicating the presence of gas below the site.

Accordingly, ikaite provides indirect evidence that CH4 reaches the surface sediment at some locations in the investigated fjord. Although reports of CH4 in coastal Icelandic sediments are rare, both biogenic and thermogenic sources have been identified at CH4 seeps in northern Iceland (Þorsteinsdóttir et al., 2020

Þorsteinsdóttir, G.V., Blischke, A., Sigurbjörnsdóttir, M.A., Òskarsson, F., Arnarson, Þ.S., Magnússon, K.P., Vilhelmsson, O. (2020) Gas seepage pockmark microbiomes suggest the presence of sedimentary coal seams in the Öxarfjörður graben of northeastern Iceland. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 66, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2019-0081

). The CH4 origin here cannot be resolved from the δ13Cikaite as multiple DIC sources influenced the porewater δ13CDIC (Teichert and Luppold, 2013

Teichert, B.M.A., Luppold, F.W. (2013) Glendonites from an Early Jurassic methane seep — Climate or methane indicators? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 390, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.03.001

), but the light isotopic signal may indicate a biogenic source (Whiticar, 1999

Whiticar, M.J. (1999) Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chemical Geology 161, 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00092-3

). This interpretation is further supported by the lack of volcanic activity in the area and δ13Cikaite values lower than those associated with thermogenically formed CH4 in hydrothermal fluids in Iceland (Stefánsson et al., 2024

Stefánsson, A., Ricci, A., Garnett, M., Gunnarsson-Robin, J., Kleine-Marshall, B.I., Scott, S.W., Lelli, M., Cardoso, C.D., Pik, R., Santinelli, C., Ono, S., Barry, P.H., Broadley, M.W., Byrne, D., Halldórsson, S.A., Fiebig, J. (2024) Isotopic and kinetic constraints on methane origins in Icelandic hydrothermal fluids. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 373, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.03.015

).

The sediment accumulation rate measured by 210Pb at RF2 was 0.43 cm yr−1 (SI). Assuming the same accumulation rate at RF2I, the ikaite would be no more than 93 years old if it were the same age as the surrounding sediment. It is plausible that the crystals were considerably younger, since the ikaite likely was not formed at the sediment-water interface but deeper in the sediment where carbonate supersaturation was reached (Lu et al., 2012

Lu, Z., Rickaby, R.E.M., Kennedy, H., Kennedy, P., Pancost, R.D., Shaw, S., Lennie, A., Wellner, J., Anderson, J.B. (2012) An ikaite record of late Holocene climate at the Antarctic Peninsula. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 325–326, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.01.036

; Whiticar et al., 2022

Whiticar, M.J., Suess, E., Wefer, G., Müller, P.J. (2022) Calcium Carbonate Hexahydrate (Ikaite): History of Mineral Formation as Recorded by Stable Isotopes. Minerals 12, 1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121627

). There is no evidence of substantial CH4 emissions from the sediment, such as pockmarks, suggesting that the occurrence of ikaite was very localised. Yet, the presence of CH4 derived ikaite so close to the sediment surface substantially expands the environmental range within which the mineral is known to form, and confirms the usability of ikaite and glendonite δ13C to track CH4 seeps in cold water environments.

top

Acknowledgments

Abstract | Introduction | Site Description and Sampling | Sediment Geochemistry | Carbonate Dynamics and Ikaite Formation | Ikaite as an Indicator of Methane | Acknowledgments | References | Supplementary Information


The authors thank the captain and crew of the RV Belgica for assistance at sea, Yannick Stroobandt at KU Leuven for carbon isotope analysis, Daniel Borschneck at CEREGE for assistance with the powder XRD analysis, and Dimitris Triandafillidis at HARBOR for assistance with single crystal XRD data collection. This research was supported by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (grant no RV/21/DEHEAT). AH was funded by a junior postdoctoral fellowship from Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO; grant no. 1241724N) and a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (MSCA; grant no. 101204337). SA was funded by the F.R.S.-FNRS (FIESTA, grant no. 35266740). JPB was funded by the US National Science Foundation (OCE-2241721) and the Lehigh CAS Dean’s Opportunity Grant. KH was funded by Queens’ College, University of Cambridge, and the Natural Environment Research Council (SiCLING, grant no. NE/X014819/1). RKJ was funded by MSCA (grant no. 101060342). PL, LV, and CW were funded by PhD fellowships from FWO (grants no. 1139224N, 1114521N, and 11P8Z24N). We thank Bo Schultz and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments on the manuscript.

Editor: Gavin Foster

top

References

Abstract | Introduction | Site Description and Sampling | Sediment Geochemistry | Carbonate Dynamics and Ikaite Formation | Ikaite as an Indicator of Methane | Acknowledgments | References | Supplementary Information

Berner, R.A. (1970) Sedimentary pyrite formation. American Journal of Science 268, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.268.1.1
Show in context

This absence of H2S is consistent with high ferric iron contents (200–300 μmol g−1) at 2–15 cm depth at station RF2, which could scavenge H2S as iron sulphides (AVS and CRS; Fig. S-3; Berner, 1970).
View in article


Bischoff, J.L., Fitzpatrick, J.A., Rosenbauer, R.J. (1993) The Solubility and Stabilization of Ikaite (CaCO3·6H2O) from 0° to 25°C: Environmental and Paleoclimatic Implications for Thinolite Tufa. The Journal of Geology 101, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/648194
Show in context

Porewater concentrations of phosphorus, Mg and sulfur, known inhibitors of calcite and aragonite growth (Bischoff et al., 1993; Tollefsen et al., 2018), were within expected ranges for coastal sediments at RF2 (Schulz, 2006; Ruttenberg, 2014; Fig. S-3).
View in article


Buchardt, B., Seaman, P., Stockmann, G., Vous, M., Wilken, U., Düwel, L., Kristiansen, A., Jenner, C., Whiticar, M.J., Kristensen, R.M., Petersen, G.H., Thorbjørn, L. (1997) Submarine columns of ikaite tufa. Nature 390, 129–130. https://doi.org/10.1038/36474
Show in context

Ikaite formation can also occur via seepage of highly alkaline groundwater, as observed in the Ikka fjord (Buchardt et al., 1997).
View in article


Campbell, K.A. (2006) Hydrocarbon seep and hydrothermal vent paleoenvironments and paleontology: Past developments and future research directions. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 232, 362–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.06.018
Show in context

Since the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) produces alkalinity (AT) and can induce authigenic carbonate precipitation in sediments, carbonates can be used to trace CH4 reservoirs by their stable carbon isotope (δ13C) composition (Campbell, 2006; Vickers et al., 2022).
View in article
Elevated pH, and DIC and AT concentrations are consistent with AOM (Campbell, 2006) and suggest a deep CH4 source, plausibly connected to the area of acoustic blanking seen in the TOPAS profile (Fig. 1b).
View in article
Increasingly negative δ13CPIC values with depth suggest in situ PIC formation incorporating isotopically light DIC from organic matter mineralisation or AOM (Campbell, 2006).
View in article


Egger, M., Riedinger, N., Mogollón, J.M., Jørgensen, B.B. (2018) Global diffusive fluxes of methane in marine sediments. Nature Geoscience 11, 421–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0122-8
Show in context

Although AOM typically produces H2S via sulphate reduction (Egger et al., 2018) and a strong H2S odour was noted during coring, no H2S was detected in the top 4 cm of sediment.
View in article


EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium (2024) https://doi.org/10.12770/cf51df64-56f9-4a99-b1aa-36b8d7b743a1
Show in context

The map was produced with the datasets LMI Digital Elevation Model, IS 50V Strandlína and IS 50V Vatnafar from Náttúrufræðistofnun, licensed under CC BY 4.0, and the EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium (2024).
View in article


Greinert, J., Derkachev, A. (2004) Glendonites and methane-derived Mg-calcites in the Sea of Okhotsk, Eastern Siberia: implications of a venting-related ikaite/glendonite formation. Marine Geology 204, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00354-2
Show in context

Because of this temperature dependence, ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite are used as proxies for cold conditions in palaeoenvironmental reconstructions (Rogov et al., 2021; Schultz et al., 2022; Vickers et al., 2022), and their δ13C signatures and presence have been applied to identify modern and past CH4 seeps in cold systems (Schubert et al., 1997; Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Teichert and Luppold, 2013; Morales et al., 2017).
View in article
The ikaite δ13C values (−49.8 to −53.8 ‰), the lowest reported for ikaite and glendonite (Fig. 2c; Rogov et al., 2020, 2021), indicate carbon derived from DIC formed during AOM (Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022).
View in article


Hiruta, A., Matsumoto, R. (2022) Geochemical comparison of ikaite and methane-derived authigenic carbonates recovered from Echigo Bank in the Sea of Japan. Marine Geology 443, 106672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2021.106672
Show in context

Although ikaite suggested to have formed due to intense organic matter degradation has been found near the sediment surface (Kennedy, 2022), ikaite linked with CH4 and AOM has only been retrieved from 1–4 m sediment depth (Schubert et al., 1997; Lu et al., 2012; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022; Kolesnik et al., 2025; also see references in Schultz et al., 2022).
View in article
The ikaite δ13C values (−49.8 to −53.8 ‰), the lowest reported for ikaite and glendonite (Fig. 2c; Rogov et al., 2020, 2021), indicate carbon derived from DIC formed during AOM (Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022).
View in article


James, R.H., Bousquet, P., Bussmann, I., Haeckel, M., Kipfer, R., Leifer, I., Niemann, H., Ostrovsky, I., Piskozub, J., Rehder, G., Treude, T., Vielstädte, L., Greinert, J. (2016) Effects of climate change on methane emissions from seafloor sediments in the Arctic Ocean: A review. Limnology and Oceanography 61, S283–S299. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10307
Show in context

The large reservoirs of methane (CH4) in Arctic and sub-Arctic marine sediments are of considerable interest due to their potential destabilisation from global warming (James et al., 2016).
View in article


Judd, A.G., Hovland, M. (1992) The evidence of shallow gas in marine sediments. Continental Shelf Research 12, 1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(92)90070-Z
Show in context

The sampling site RF2 (65° 0.9021’ N; 13° 53.5279’ W; 150 m depth) is located above an area of acoustic blanking identified by a hull mounted TOPAS profiler (Fig. 1b), indicating sub-seafloor gas (Judd and Hovland, 1992).
View in article


Karson, J.A., Farrell, J.A., Chutas, L.A., Nanfito, A.F., Proett, J.A., Runnals, K.T., Sæmundsson, K. (2018) Rift-Parallel Strike-Slip Faulting Near the Iceland Plate Boundary Zone: Implications for Propagating Rifts. Tectonics 37, 4567–4594. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005206
Show in context

The proximity to the Helgustaðir mine, where Icelandic spar was historically extracted, and faults in the region (Karson et al., 2018), indicate that such inputs are possible.
View in article


Kennedy, G.L. (2022) Glendonites: Enigmatic Mineral Pseudomorphs and Their Ephemeral Precursor. Rocks and Minerals 97, 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/00357529.2022.2087146
Show in context

Although ikaite suggested to have formed due to intense organic matter degradation has been found near the sediment surface (Kennedy, 2022), ikaite linked with CH4 and AOM has only been retrieved from 1–4 m sediment depth (Schubert et al., 1997; Lu et al., 2012; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022; Kolesnik et al., 2025; also see references in Schultz et al., 2022).
View in article


Kolesnik, O.N., Kolesnik, A.N., Karabtsov, A.A., Vasilenko, Yu. P., Gorbarev, A.A. (2025) Ikaite from Holocene Sediments of the Chukchi Sea. Doklady Earth Sciences 520, 3. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X24604383
Show in context

Although ikaite suggested to have formed due to intense organic matter degradation has been found near the sediment surface (Kennedy, 2022), ikaite linked with CH4 and AOM has only been retrieved from 1–4 m sediment depth (Schubert et al., 1997; Lu et al., 2012; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022; Kolesnik et al., 2025; also see references in Schultz et al., 2022).
View in article


Lu, Z., Rickaby, R.E.M., Kennedy, H., Kennedy, P., Pancost, R.D., Shaw, S., Lennie, A., Wellner, J., Anderson, J.B. (2012) An ikaite record of late Holocene climate at the Antarctic Peninsula. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 325–326, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.01.036
Show in context

It forms at low temperatures (<6 °C) under highly alkaline conditions, where inhibitors such as phosphate and organic compounds suppress the precipitation of less soluble calcium carbonate phases, such as calcite and aragonite (Lu et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2015; Tollefsen et al., 2018).
View in article
Although ikaite suggested to have formed due to intense organic matter degradation has been found near the sediment surface (Kennedy, 2022), ikaite linked with CH4 and AOM has only been retrieved from 1–4 m sediment depth (Schubert et al., 1997; Lu et al., 2012; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022; Kolesnik et al., 2025; also see references in Schultz et al., 2022).
View in article
It is plausible that the crystals were considerably younger, since the ikaite likely was not formed at the sediment-water interface but deeper in the sediment where carbonate supersaturation was reached (Lu et al., 2012; Whiticar et al., 2022).
View in article


Morales, C., Rogov, M., Wierzbowski, H., Ershova, V., Suan, G., Adatte, T., Föllmi, K.B., Tegelaar, E., Reichart, G.-J., de Lange, G.J., Middelburg, J.J., van de Schootbrugge, B. (2017) Glendonites track methane seepage in Mesozoic polar seas. Geology 45, 503–506. https://doi.org/10.1130/G38967.1
Show in context

Because of this temperature dependence, ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite are used as proxies for cold conditions in palaeoenvironmental reconstructions (Rogov et al., 2021; Schultz et al., 2022; Vickers et al., 2022), and their δ13C signatures and presence have been applied to identify modern and past CH4 seeps in cold systems (Schubert et al., 1997; Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Teichert and Luppold, 2013; Morales et al., 2017).
View in article
This observation substantially extends the known depth range of CH4 derived ikaite (Teichert and Luppold, 2013; Morales et al., 2017), supporting its use for tracing past occurrences of CH4 at the sediment surface, and demonstrates, for the first time, the presence of ikaite in Icelandic waters (Rogov et al., 2021).
View in article


Pataki, D.E., Ehleringer, J.R., Flanagan, L.B., Yakir, D., Bowling, D.R., Still, C.J., Buchmann, N., Kaplan, J.O., Berry, J.A. (2003) The application and interpretation of Keeling plots in terrestrial carbon cycle research. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001850
Show in context

Assuming organic matter degradation and carbonate dissolution are the only DIC sources, their relative contributions were estimated from a Keeling plot (Pataki et al., 2003).
View in article


Pauly, H. (1963) “Ikaite”, a new mineral from Greenland. Arctic 16, 263–264. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic3545
Show in context

The mineral ikaite (CaCO3·6H2O) (Pauly, 1963) is of particular interest as an indicator of CH4 and AOM.
View in article


Rogov, M., Ershova, V., Vereshchagin, O., Vasileva, K., Mikhailova, K., Krylov, A. (2021) Database of global glendonite and ikaite records throughout the Phanerozoic. Earth System Science Data. Copernicus GmbH 13, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-343-2021
Show in context

Because of this temperature dependence, ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite are used as proxies for cold conditions in palaeoenvironmental reconstructions (Rogov et al., 2021; Schultz et al., 2022; Vickers et al., 2022), and their δ13C signatures and presence have been applied to identify modern and past CH4 seeps in cold systems (Schubert et al., 1997; Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Teichert and Luppold, 2013; Morales et al., 2017).
View in article
This observation substantially extends the known depth range of CH4 derived ikaite (Teichert and Luppold, 2013; Morales et al., 2017), supporting its use for tracing past occurrences of CH4 at the sediment surface, and demonstrates, for the first time, the presence of ikaite in Icelandic waters (Rogov et al., 2021).
View in article
(c) Global compilation of isotopic compositions of glendonite and ikaite (Rogov et al., 2021), including the ikaite from this study.
View in article
The ikaite δ13C values (−49.8 to −53.8 ‰), the lowest reported for ikaite and glendonite (Fig. 2c; Rogov et al., 2020, 2021), indicate carbon derived from DIC formed during AOM (Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022).
View in article


Rogov, M., Vasileva, K., Mikhailova, K., Ershova, V. (2020) Database of global glendonite and ikaite records throughout the Phanerozoic. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7833894
Show in context

The ikaite δ13C values (−49.8 to −53.8 ‰), the lowest reported for ikaite and glendonite (Fig. 2c; Rogov et al., 2020, 2021), indicate carbon derived from DIC formed during AOM (Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022).
View in article


Ruttenberg, K.C. (2014) The Global Phosphorus Cycle. In: Holland, H.D., Turekian, K.K. (Eds.) Treatise on Geochemistry (Second Edition). Elsevier, Oxford, 499–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00813-5
Show in context

Porewater concentrations of phosphorus, Mg and sulfur, known inhibitors of calcite and aragonite growth (Bischoff et al., 1993; Tollefsen et al., 2018), were within expected ranges for coastal sediments at RF2 (Schulz, 2006; Ruttenberg, 2014; Fig. S-3).
View in article


Schubert, C.J., Nürnberg, D., Scheele, N., Pauer, F., Kriews, M. (1997) 13C isotope depletion in ikaite crystals: evidence for methane release from the Siberian shelves? Geo-Marine Letters 17, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003670050023
Show in context

Because of this temperature dependence, ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite are used as proxies for cold conditions in palaeoenvironmental reconstructions (Rogov et al., 2021; Schultz et al., 2022; Vickers et al., 2022), and their δ13C signatures and presence have been applied to identify modern and past CH4 seeps in cold systems (Schubert et al., 1997; Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Teichert and Luppold, 2013; Morales et al., 2017).
View in article
Although ikaite suggested to have formed due to intense organic matter degradation has been found near the sediment surface (Kennedy, 2022), ikaite linked with CH4 and AOM has only been retrieved from 1–4 m sediment depth (Schubert et al., 1997; Lu et al., 2012; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022; Kolesnik et al., 2025; also see references in Schultz et al., 2022).
View in article


Schultz, B., Thibault, N., Huggett, J. (2022) The minerals ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite: Historical perspective and legacies of Douglas Shearman and Alec K. Smith. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 133, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2022.02.003
Show in context

Because of this temperature dependence, ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite are used as proxies for cold conditions in palaeoenvironmental reconstructions (Rogov et al., 2021; Schultz et al., 2022; Vickers et al., 2022), and their δ13C signatures and presence have been applied to identify modern and past CH4 seeps in cold systems (Schubert et al., 1997; Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Teichert and Luppold, 2013; Morales et al., 2017).
View in article
Although ikaite suggested to have formed due to intense organic matter degradation has been found near the sediment surface (Kennedy, 2022), ikaite linked with CH4 and AOM has only been retrieved from 1–4 m sediment depth (Schubert et al., 1997; Lu et al., 2012; Hiruta and Matsumoto, 2022; Kolesnik et al., 2025; also see references in Schultz et al., 2022).
View in article


Schulz, H.D. (2006) Quantification of Early Diagenesis: Dissolved Constituents in Pore Water and Signals in the Solid Phase. In: Schulz, H.D., Zabel, M. (Eds.) Marine Geochemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 73–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32144-6_3
Show in context

Porewater concentrations of phosphorus, Mg and sulfur, known inhibitors of calcite and aragonite growth (Bischoff et al., 1993; Tollefsen et al., 2018), were within expected ranges for coastal sediments at RF2 (Schulz, 2006; Ruttenberg, 2014; Fig. S-3).
View in article


Stefánsson, A., Ricci, A., Garnett, M., Gunnarsson-Robin, J., Kleine-Marshall, B.I., Scott, S.W., Lelli, M., Cardoso, C.D., Pik, R., Santinelli, C., Ono, S., Barry, P.H., Broadley, M.W., Byrne, D., Halldórsson, S.A., Fiebig, J. (2024) Isotopic and kinetic constraints on methane origins in Icelandic hydrothermal fluids. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 373, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.03.015
Show in context

This interpretation is further supported by the lack of volcanic activity in the area and δ13Cikaite values lower than those associated with thermogenically formed CH4 in hydrothermal fluids in Iceland (Stefánsson et al., 2024).
View in article


Teichert, B.M.A., Luppold, F.W. (2013) Glendonites from an Early Jurassic methane seep — Climate or methane indicators? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 390, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.03.001
Show in context

Because of this temperature dependence, ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite are used as proxies for cold conditions in palaeoenvironmental reconstructions (Rogov et al., 2021; Schultz et al., 2022; Vickers et al., 2022), and their δ13C signatures and presence have been applied to identify modern and past CH4 seeps in cold systems (Schubert et al., 1997; Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Teichert and Luppold, 2013; Morales et al., 2017).
View in article
This observation substantially extends the known depth range of CH4 derived ikaite (Teichert and Luppold, 2013; Morales et al., 2017), supporting its use for tracing past occurrences of CH4 at the sediment surface, and demonstrates, for the first time, the presence of ikaite in Icelandic waters (Rogov et al., 2021).
View in article
The CH4 origin here cannot be resolved from the δ13Cikaite as multiple DIC sources influenced the porewater δ13CDIC (Teichert and Luppold, 2013), but the light isotopic signal may indicate a biogenic source (Whiticar, 1999).
View in article


Thordarson, T., Höskuldsson, Á. (2008) Postglacial volcanism in Iceland. Jökull 58, 197–228. https://doi.org/10.33799/jokull2008.58.197
Show in context

Sampling and analytical methods are detailed in the Supplementary Information. The fjord is not influenced by active volcanic systems (Thordarson and Höskuldsson, 2008).
View in article
Volcanic ash diagenesis can enhance carbonate saturation and promote ikaite precipitation (Vickers et al., 2024), but this is unlikely here given the absence of nearby volcanic activity (Thordarson and Höskuldsson, 2008) and the mineralogical similarities between RF2 and RF2I (Fig. S-2).
View in article


Tollefsen, E., Stockmann, G., Skelton, A., Mörth, C.-M., Dupraz, C., Sturkell, E. (2018) Chemical controls on ikaite formation. Mineralogical Magazine 82, 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2018.110
Show in context

It forms at low temperatures (<6 °C) under highly alkaline conditions, where inhibitors such as phosphate and organic compounds suppress the precipitation of less soluble calcium carbonate phases, such as calcite and aragonite (Lu et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2015; Tollefsen et al., 2018).
View in article
Porewater concentrations of phosphorus, Mg and sulfur, known inhibitors of calcite and aragonite growth (Bischoff et al., 1993; Tollefsen et al., 2018), were within expected ranges for coastal sediments at RF2 (Schulz, 2006; Ruttenberg, 2014; Fig. S-3).
View in article


Vickers, M.L., Jones, M.T., Longman, J., Evans, D., Ullmann, C.V., Wulfsberg Stokke, E., Vickers, M., Frieling, J., Harper, D.T., Clementi, V.J., IODP Expedition 396 Scientists (2024) Paleocene–Eocene age glendonites from the Mid-Norwegian Margin – indicators of cold snaps in the hothouse? Climate of the Past 20, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1-2024
Show in context

Volcanic ash diagenesis can enhance carbonate saturation and promote ikaite precipitation (Vickers et al., 2024), but this is unlikely here given the absence of nearby volcanic activity (Thordarson and Höskuldsson, 2008) and the mineralogical similarities between RF2 and RF2I (Fig. S-2).
View in article


Vickers, M.L., Vickers, M., Rickaby, R.E.M., Wu, H., Bernasconi, S.M., Ullmann, C.V., Bohrmann, G., Spielhagen, R.F., Kassens, H., Pagh Schultz, B., Alwmark, C., Thibault, N., Korte, C. (2022) The ikaite to calcite transformation: Implications for palaeoclimate studies. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 334, 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.08.001
Show in context

Since the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) produces alkalinity (AT) and can induce authigenic carbonate precipitation in sediments, carbonates can be used to trace CH4 reservoirs by their stable carbon isotope (δ13C) composition (Campbell, 2006; Vickers et al., 2022).
View in article
Because of this temperature dependence, ikaite and its pseudomorph glendonite are used as proxies for cold conditions in palaeoenvironmental reconstructions (Rogov et al., 2021; Schultz et al., 2022; Vickers et al., 2022), and their δ13C signatures and presence have been applied to identify modern and past CH4 seeps in cold systems (Schubert et al., 1997; Greinert and Derkachev, 2004; Teichert and Luppold, 2013; Morales et al., 2017).
View in article


Whiticar, M.J. (1999) Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chemical Geology 161, 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00092-3
Show in context

The CH4 origin here cannot be resolved from the δ13Cikaite as multiple DIC sources influenced the porewater δ13CDIC (Teichert and Luppold, 2013), but the light isotopic signal may indicate a biogenic source (Whiticar, 1999).
View in article


Whiticar, M.J., Suess, E., Wefer, G., Müller, P.J. (2022) Calcium Carbonate Hexahydrate (Ikaite): History of Mineral Formation as Recorded by Stable Isotopes. Minerals 12, 1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121627
Show in context

It is plausible that the crystals were considerably younger, since the ikaite likely was not formed at the sediment-water interface but deeper in the sediment where carbonate supersaturation was reached (Lu et al., 2012; Whiticar et al., 2022).
View in article


Zhou, X., Lu, Z., Rickaby, R.E.M., Domack, E.W., Wellner, J.S., Kennedy, H.A. (2015) Ikaite Abundance Controlled by Porewater Phosphorus Level: Potential Links to Dust and Productivity. The Journal of Geology 123, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1086/681918
Show in context

It forms at low temperatures (<6 °C) under highly alkaline conditions, where inhibitors such as phosphate and organic compounds suppress the precipitation of less soluble calcium carbonate phases, such as calcite and aragonite (Lu et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2015; Tollefsen et al., 2018).
View in article


Þorsteinsdóttir, G.V., Blischke, A., Sigurbjörnsdóttir, M.A., Òskarsson, F., Arnarson, Þ.S., Magnússon, K.P., Vilhelmsson, O. (2020) Gas seepage pockmark microbiomes suggest the presence of sedimentary coal seams in the Öxarfjörður graben of northeastern Iceland. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 66, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2019-0081
Show in context

Although reports of CH4 in coastal Icelandic sediments are rare, both biogenic and thermogenic sources have been identified at CH4 seeps in northern Iceland (Þorsteinsdóttir et al., 2020).
View in article



top

Supplementary Information

Abstract | Introduction | Site Description and Sampling | Sediment Geochemistry | Carbonate Dynamics and Ikaite Formation | Ikaite as an Indicator of Methane | Acknowledgments | References | Supplementary Information


The Supplementary Information includes:
  • Methods
  • Table S-1
  • Figures S-1 to S-3
  • Supplementary Information References


Download the Supplementary Information (PDF)
top

Figures



Figure 1 (a) Map of the sampling site (RF2) in Reyðarfjörður, eastern Iceland. The area within the black line shows the bottom topography as mapped by multibeam echo sounder. The orange line shows the location of the sub-bottom transect in panel B. The map was produced with the datasets LMI Digital Elevation Model, IS 50V Strandlína and IS 50V Vatnafar from Náttúrufræðistofnun, licensed under CC BY 4.0, and the EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium (2024)

EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium (2024) https://doi.org/10.12770/cf51df64-56f9-4a99-b1aa-36b8d7b743a1

. (b) Sub-bottom transect showing acoustic blanking below station RF2, suggesting the presence of gas. TWT = two way travel time.
Back to article


Figure 2 (a) Photograph of three of the ikaite crystals found at RF2I. (b) Photograph of a dried, recrystallised ikaite crystal marked with ‘b’ in panel (a). (c) Global compilation of isotopic compositions of glendonite and ikaite (Rogov et al., 2021

Rogov, M., Ershova, V., Vereshchagin, O., Vasileva, K., Mikhailova, K., Krylov, A. (2021) Database of global glendonite and ikaite records throughout the Phanerozoic. Earth System Science Data. Copernicus GmbH 13, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-343-2021

), including the ikaite from this study.
Back to article


Figure 3 Porewater and solid phase profiles from stations RF2 and RF2I. Filled and empty markers represent replicate sediment cores, grey lines represent microprofiling data. The light grey area in the pH graph marks the scale of the O2 graph. Note the differences in scales on both x and y axes between plots.
Back to article


Figure 4 (a) Sediment-water fluxes of alkalinity (AT), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and total oxygen uptake (TOU) from RF2 (grey) and RF2I (orange). Large circles mark fluxes measured in the incubation chambers; small circles mark diffusive O2 uptake rates from microprofiling data. (b) Keeling plot showing the DIC concentration and δ13C composition (δ13CDIC) in the incubations. The calculated intercepts indicate the δ13C signal of the combined DIC sources in each incubation.
Back to article

  • Contact us
  • |
  • Subscribe
  • |
  • Sign up to the EAG newsletter
  • Connect with us
  • Bluesky
  • facebook
  • Linkedin
  • youtube
Geochemical Perspectives Letters is a registered trademark of the European Association of Geochemistry
ISSN 2410-339X (print) | ISSN 2410-3403 (online)
EAG Privacy Policy