Corrigendum to “Plume-lithosphere interaction, and the formation of fibrous diamonds” by Broadley et al., 2018Affiliations | Corresponding Author | Cite as | Funding information
1Geochemical Research Center, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
2Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, 54501 Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy Cedex, France
3School of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
4Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, SB RAS, Koptyuga ave. 3, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
5Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova st. 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
6The School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK
7NIGP (Geo-Scientific research Enterprise) ALROSA Co., Chernyshevskoe rd. 7, 678170, Mirny, Sakha Republic, Russia
8Department of Basic Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
Corrigendum to “Plume-lithosphere interaction, and the formation of fibrous diamonds” by Broadley et al., 2018. Geochem. Persp. Let. 10, 7.
Geochemical Perspectives Letters 10 | doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1825cor
Received 4 March 2019 | Accepted 6 March 2019 | Published 13 March 2019
Copyright © The Authors
Published by the European Association of Geochemistry
under Creative Commons License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Cumulative count of HTML views and PDF downloads.
- Download Citation
Correction to: Geochemical Perspectives Letters 8, 26–30, doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1825cor, published on 1 October 2018.
The authors regret that several typographic errors were included within Table S-2 in the Supplementary Information. This resulted in some of the concentrations being reported to the wrong order of magnitude. Furthermore, in Figure 2 there were one too many NBRS samples plotted, whilst sample NBCN-7 was absent from Figure 2 and Figure S-5.
We have corrected these errors and the correct versions of Figure 2, Figure S-5 and Table S-2 are shown below.
Table S-2 Helium and Neon concentration and isotopic ratios from crushing and laser extraction (italics) from the Nyurbinskaya diamonds. Diamond NBCB-9, was not successfully crushed and the complete diamond was analysed by laser extraction for noble gases. All uncertainties are reported to 1σ. n.d = not determined.
|Sample||Mass (mg)||4He cm3 STP/g||±||3He/4He RA||±||20Ne cm3 STP/g||±||20Ne/22Ne||±||21Ne/22Ne||±||40Ar/36Ar||±|
|NBCB-1||6.9||2.1 x 10-6||8.5 x 10-8||7.84||0.56||3.4 x 10-11||3.7 x 10-12||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||2755.7||198.1|
|4.3||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||1.6 x 10-10||4.7 x 10-13||10.04||0.04||0.0307||0.0014||n.d||n.d|
|NBCB-4||3.8||1.6 x 10-5||6.9 x 10-7||10.5||0.69||1.3 x 10-11||6.4 x 10-11||10.43||0.14||0.0302||0.0011||862.5||61.8|
|NBCB-5||6||1.3 x 10-5||5.9 x 10-7||11.23||0.74||5.1 x 10-10||2.7 x 10-11||10.94||0.22||0.0368||0.0039||1956.9||122|
|NBCB-9||5||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||3.4 x 10-10||9.0 x 10-13||9.99||0.03||0.0288||0.0006||n.d||n.d|
|NBCB-7||5.8||2.3 x 10-6||1.2 x 10-7||9.95||0.77||3.6 x 10-10||1.9 x 10-11||10.76||0.37||0.0321||0.0032||352.1||25.2|
|NBRS-2||7.3||2.4 x 10-7||1.3 x 10-8||3.65||0.78||1.8 x 10-10||9.6 x 10-12||10.15||0.86||0.0288||0.0053||298.6||21.4|
|3.8||4.3 x 10-11||9.3 x 10-12||2.96||0.94||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d|
|NBRS-5||5.1||7.5 x 10-7||3.8 x 10-8||8.62||0.6||2.1 x 10-10||1.2 x 10-11||10.51||0.97||0.0294||0.007||437.6||31.4|
|3||3.9 x 10-9||7.7 x 10-11||2.78||0.95||3.2 x 10-11||1.1 x 10-13||10.16||0.04||0.0287||0.0013||n.d||n.d|
|NBRS-8||7.1||1.7 x 10-6||7.2 x 10-8||4.72||0.56||1.7 x 10-10||1.1 x 10-11||9.86||1.06||0.0323||0.0077||461||24|
|4.5||9.8 x 10-10||3.2 x 10-11||5.62||0.37||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d||n.d|
|NBCT-11||6.3||4.0 x 10-7||2.1 x 10-8||7.21||0.9||5.8 x 10-11||3.8 x 10-12||9.36||1.69||0.0334||0.0139||339.1||24.2|
|3.4||3.9 x 10-9||3.1 x 10-11||6.18||0.22||4.0 x 10-11||1.4 x 10-13||10.02||0.03||0.0302||0.001||n.d||n.d|
The text and interpretation of the manuscript are unaffected by these changes. We apologise for any inconvenience caused and thank Suzette Timmerman for bringing this issue to our attention.
Publisher's note: Figure 2 has been corrected in the online and PDF versions of the original article. Table S-2 and Figure S-5 have been corrected in the Supplementary Information PDF that accompanies the original article.