Geochemical Perspectives Letters
Geochemical
Perspectives Letters
Geochemical
Perspectives
  • Submit here
  • Track your paper
  • For authors
  • e-Alerts
  • Home
  • About
    • About the journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Policy
    • Publication Ethics
  • Submission & Review
    • Copyright & Permissions
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
  • Current issue
  • All issues
  • Submit
Select Page Menu

by admin | Nov 14, 2019 | vol12 | 0 comments

G. Rustioni, A. Audétat, H. Keppler

12

1925cor

29

October

2019

31

October

2019

14

November

2019

27

27

0

Next article >><< Previous article

Corrigendum to “Experimental evidence for fluid-induced melting in subduction zones” by Rustioni et al., 2019

G. Rustioni1,

1Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universität Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany

A. Audétat1,

1Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universität Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany

H. Keppler1

1Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universität Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany

Affiliations | Corresponding Author | Cite as | Funding information

H. Keppler
Email: hans.keppler@uni-bayreuth.de

1Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universität Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany

Rustioni, G., Audétat, A., Keppler, H. (2019) Corrigendum to “Experimental evidence for fluid-induced melting in subduction zones” by Rustioni et al., 2019. Geochem. Persp. Let. 12, 27-27.

DFG, International Research Training Group “Deep Earth Volatile Cycles”, GRK 2156/1.

Geochemical Perspectives Letters v12 | doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1925cor
Received 29 October 2019 | Accepted 31 October 2019 | Published 14 November 2019

Copyright © The Authors

Published by the European Association of Geochemistry
under Creative Commons License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

 
  • Share this article

  • Article views:
    776

    Cumulative count of HTML views and PDF downloads.

  • Download Citation
  • Rights & Permissions

top

Corrigendum

Corrigendum | Original article

Correction to: Geochemical Perspectives Letters 11, 49-54, doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1925, published on 22 October 2019.

In the original version of Supplementary Table S-3, the sequence of numbers given does not correspond to the legend in the left column. The real sequence from top to bottom is: SiO2 - FeO - MgO - TiO2 - CaO - Al2O3 - Na2O - Total.

The authors apologise for the mistake.

A corrected version of Table S-3 is shown below, and the table has now been corrected in the Supplementary Information PDF that accompanies the original article.

Table S-3 Microprobe analyses of garnet and omphacite (in wt. %).
Garnet
SiO239.1739.3239.8639.4339.2538.7739.0239.1939.26
TiO20.690.690.710.640.630.890.790.630.74
Al2O32221.5321.9121.9321.6720.8321.3321.4720.8
MgO7.357.467.367.157.177.296.668.186.69
CaO11.3710.8210.7410.7610.189.8511.328.510.89
FeO20.0420.8321.0820.5721.622.2721.2122.1421.8
Na2O0.060.060.050.090.060.070.090.060.21
Total100.7100.7101.7100.6100.6100100.4100.2100.4

Omphacite
SiO254.5754.6955.8153.8153.53
TiO20.280.210.130.490.84
Al2O312.2312.6110.210.510.62
MgO7.88.39.778.98.23
CaO12.9112.7814.7613.5513.83
FeO4.133.055.187.646.9
Na2O6.016.525.815.465.9
Total 97.9 98.1 101.6 100.3 99.8

Garnet and omphacite compositions were measured on grains across the capsule in one single experiment (PC09). The average garnet composition is (Ca0.29Mg0.27Fe0.44)3(Al0.97Fe0.03)2(SiO4)3, the average pyroxene composition is Ca0.52Na0.41Mg0.46Fe0.16Al0.44Si1.96O6.


top

  • Contact us
  • |
  • Subscribe
Sign up for our newsletter
  • Connect with us
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • youtube

Geochemical Perspectives Letters is a registered trademark of the European Association of Geochemistry
ISSN 2410-339X (print) | ISSN 2410-3403 (online)
EAG Privacy Policy